Difference between revisions of "User talk:Camponhoyle"

From BRGS Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Changed protection level for "User talk:Camponhoyle": Registered users should be able to post. Rules are in place for sorting out any vandalism. ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))
m (The hack attack!)
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The Archive:[[User talk:Camponhoyle/archive]]
 
The Archive:[[User talk:Camponhoyle/archive]]
  
==A couple of things==
+
If you have an issue with my editing or another user feel free to comment below (with a title and signature, please) and I will try to get back to you as quickly as possible. If you want to leave a message in private please email me at Camponhoyle96@googlemail.com
  
Re:Rumours of blackmail. If this is true then it's quite worrying. If not, then fair enough. To be honest it's not likely I'll be able to uncover all the facts as I don't know either of you. I advise you and BRGSMan sort out any problems between you in person. I'd rather pre-empt any problems and it all turn out to be nothing, rather than the other way round.
+
===Recent issues at school===
  
Also, I don't think your talk page needs protecting so I'm unlocking it. Deal with any vandalism as appropriate.
+
(this is addressed to all moderators)
  
''{{User:Chris/sig}} 16:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)''
+
I have been informed of another side of events, and there are suggestions that some moderators have been abusing their power and making unacceptable edits. I will dig further, and if I find that this is the case, I will be permanently blocking accounts of any offenders. However, I am also prepared to offer an amnesty - if you are willing to own up to any breach of the rules, now is the time to do so. We have to take matters like this seriously, as it undermines the authority of the administrators, and puts us in an extremely difficult position.
  
==Matthew Hoyle==
+
On the other hand, if you are innocent, and the allegations are not substantiated, we can continue as before.
You need a reason to delete the part on the biology, just as SellersWithAnN said. {{User:BRGSMan/sig}} 21:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
+
  
 +
Chris
  
''No offense or anything, but there's no need to post the welcome message on every account that it hasn't been posted on yet. New accounts it's helpful. Accounts that have been editing for a while, it can be seen as slightly patronising.''
+
''As an update, an example has been given as the page of [[Rebecca Finley]]. I've deleted it, but I'm sure you can see why it was an issue - the comments are <u>potentially</u> offensive. It does breach the guidelines as set out on the [[Vandalism]] page - i.e. that comments cannot be potentially offensive. Please make sure you're aware of this in future.''
  
''[[User:Eve|Eve]] 21:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)''
+
===To All Moderators===
  
 +
This is just a general note to all of the moderators - could you please make sure you '''check your spelling and grammar''' when editing? It does look unprofessional when the admins can't spell correctly. Most new browsers should have spellcheckers built in.
  
===Admin===
+
Thanks,
  
 +
''{{User:Chris/sig}} 21:24, 2 November 2010 (GMT)''
  
Since you have been craving adminship for a while, Im going to give you a week trial period. Lets see how you go. {{User:BRGSMan/sig}} 18:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
+
== The hack attack! ==
  
I'll copy and paste what I said to Magical Trevor:
+
Just a message to say thanks for helping me get rid of that hacker. {{User:BRGSMan/sig}} 17:05, 24 November 2010 (GMT)
  
(We)'ve decided to make you an Admin for now. This is on a week trial period, at the end we'll evaluate how well you're doing! A few pointers:
 
  
*I'm sure you know this is a position of responsibility. You must remain completely impartial, and follow the guidelines laid out for [[bans]] etc. (We have a clear policy and we have to enforce it correctly, please review it and contact me if you ban anyone).
+
''Should we not put some sort of announcement out so that anyone looking through the recent changes section doesn't unwittingly click the link?''
*Please make sure you lead by example - preview your posts before saving them, ensure spelling and grammar is correct etc.
+
*If you aren't sure how to proceed and no one else is around, drop either me or BRGSMan a line and we'll advise.
+
  
After a week we'll decide whether to keep you as an Admin or not. Don't feel under pressure to make a ton of edits in that time, just keep doing things right and it'll all be fine. ''{{User:Chris/sig}} 22:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)''
+
''[[User:Eve|Eve]] 17:10, 24 November 2010 (GMT)''
 +
 
 +
:I've added a red box to the Community Portal... is this ok? Should it be added to main page? I wasn't around for the "hack attack" -is everything ok now? {{User:1885/Sig}}
 +
 
 +
Yes. Everything is alright now. Camponhoyle and BRGSMan rolledback all of the changes so everything is back to normal. Unless you look at the pages' history. [[User:Dangerousx|Dangerousx]] 19:18, 2 December 2010 (GMT)
 +
 
 +
:OK! Thanks for letting me know. {{User:1885/Sig}}

Latest revision as of 17:13, 3 December 2010

The Archive:User talk:Camponhoyle/archive

If you have an issue with my editing or another user feel free to comment below (with a title and signature, please) and I will try to get back to you as quickly as possible. If you want to leave a message in private please email me at Camponhoyle96@googlemail.com

Recent issues at school

(this is addressed to all moderators)

I have been informed of another side of events, and there are suggestions that some moderators have been abusing their power and making unacceptable edits. I will dig further, and if I find that this is the case, I will be permanently blocking accounts of any offenders. However, I am also prepared to offer an amnesty - if you are willing to own up to any breach of the rules, now is the time to do so. We have to take matters like this seriously, as it undermines the authority of the administrators, and puts us in an extremely difficult position.

On the other hand, if you are innocent, and the allegations are not substantiated, we can continue as before.

Chris

As an update, an example has been given as the page of Rebecca Finley. I've deleted it, but I'm sure you can see why it was an issue - the comments are potentially offensive. It does breach the guidelines as set out on the Vandalism page - i.e. that comments cannot be potentially offensive. Please make sure you're aware of this in future.

To All Moderators

This is just a general note to all of the moderators - could you please make sure you check your spelling and grammar when editing? It does look unprofessional when the admins can't spell correctly. Most new browsers should have spellcheckers built in.

Thanks,

Chris talk - mod 21:24, 2 November 2010 (GMT)

The hack attack!

Just a message to say thanks for helping me get rid of that hacker. Any other help? Let me know! Thanks BRGSMan talk - contribs 17:05, 24 November 2010 (GMT)


Should we not put some sort of announcement out so that anyone looking through the recent changes section doesn't unwittingly click the link?

Eve 17:10, 24 November 2010 (GMT)

I've added a red box to the Community Portal... is this ok? Should it be added to main page? I wasn't around for the "hack attack" -is everything ok now? 1885 ProjectsTalk PageSuggestionsUser PageFeedback

Yes. Everything is alright now. Camponhoyle and BRGSMan rolledback all of the changes so everything is back to normal. Unless you look at the pages' history. Dangerousx 19:18, 2 December 2010 (GMT)

OK! Thanks for letting me know. 1885 ProjectsTalk PageSuggestionsUser PageFeedback