Difference between revisions of "User talk:Camponhoyle"
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Hi there Camponhoyle, I have seen your request and decided to check your history for any vandalism that has been found on several occasions which could put people such as I and [[User:Chris|Chris]] into thinking that you don't deserve to be admin. I also did a quick google on you to see if you where seen in any of the results and I found this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Camponhoyle], saying that an account with the same name was a sockpuppeteer, similar to Idiot123 is on this wiki. Looking deeper, I found the list of confirmed sockpuppets [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Camponhoyle], which included two accounts, Randomer789, an account also on this wiki as a sockpuppet and Idiot997, similar in name to Idiot123 of this wiki. This is highly suspicious. I will be considering whether or not to ban you. [[User:BRGSMan|BRGSMan]] 20:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | Hi there Camponhoyle, I have seen your request and decided to check your history for any vandalism that has been found on several occasions which could put people such as I and [[User:Chris|Chris]] into thinking that you don't deserve to be admin. I also did a quick google on you to see if you where seen in any of the results and I found this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Camponhoyle], saying that an account with the same name was a sockpuppeteer, similar to Idiot123 is on this wiki. Looking deeper, I found the list of confirmed sockpuppets [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Camponhoyle], which included two accounts, Randomer789, an account also on this wiki as a sockpuppet and Idiot997, similar in name to Idiot123 of this wiki. This is highly suspicious. I will be considering whether or not to ban you. [[User:BRGSMan|BRGSMan]] 20:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I do apologise, looking even deeper into the topic, I have discovered that you may have had a rough patch, but as a wikipedia admin once said, you may make mistakes, but you just create a new account and start again like you have on the wiki, with minor blips of vandalism that was likely non-intentional. I cannot make you an admin as I am not a bureaucrat, but I will request that you are made an admin. Apologies again [[User:BRGSMan|BRGSMan]] 21:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 12 December 2009
Contents
Triangle Head
Please can you not vandalise the wiki on the page Triangle head. I have heard at school that this is offending Toby, so please don't. BRGSMan 16:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Please sign your name with four tildes ~ after talking on a talk page, otherwise it is rude. BRGSMan 16:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
The New Crew
Please don't make false statements about yourself. There is no such thing as "The New Crew" and if it existed, i don't believe you are in it. Please delete this section from your page.
I have told you before, please sign your name with four tildes ~ after talking on a talk page, otherwise it is rude. BRGSMan 20:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Me and Twistedspoon have our own group thank you but he has already told me that you are welcome to join ours. Ok? BRGSMan 20:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Mrs Bamford
Please do not vandalise the wiki. Anyway I thought you were fighting against vandalism. BRGSMan 17:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I would certainly advise that you spell check everything you write because I have noticed you have made a lot of spelling mistakes, and you can't just delete everything on a teacher's page because you don't like them. BRGSMan 17:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Grammar Issues
Honestly! Please spell words correctly because it is getting really, really annoying. And your grammar sucks too. Please take more care. Sellers (WithAnN) 17:26, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Admin
Hi Camponhoyle, I am now an admin so if you need anything sorting, ask me. Thanks BRGSMan 20:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Non use of whiteboard curse
Please do not make pages if you are not going to put content on them. BRGSMan 19:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
What has this go to do with BRGS? Does it even exist? BRGSMan 19:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Adminship
Hi there Camponhoyle, I have seen your request and decided to check your history for any vandalism that has been found on several occasions which could put people such as I and Chris into thinking that you don't deserve to be admin. I also did a quick google on you to see if you where seen in any of the results and I found this [1], saying that an account with the same name was a sockpuppeteer, similar to Idiot123 is on this wiki. Looking deeper, I found the list of confirmed sockpuppets [2], which included two accounts, Randomer789, an account also on this wiki as a sockpuppet and Idiot997, similar in name to Idiot123 of this wiki. This is highly suspicious. I will be considering whether or not to ban you. BRGSMan 20:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I do apologise, looking even deeper into the topic, I have discovered that you may have had a rough patch, but as a wikipedia admin once said, you may make mistakes, but you just create a new account and start again like you have on the wiki, with minor blips of vandalism that was likely non-intentional. I cannot make you an admin as I am not a bureaucrat, but I will request that you are made an admin. Apologies again BRGSMan 21:03, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
